Skip to main content

6 posts tagged with "conda-forge"

View All Tags

· 3 min read

As 2020 winds down, the Core team thought it'd be fun to review some of the big accomplishments our community has made this year.

Strong Growth

The conda-forge community has grown immensely this year. Here are some numbers to help give you an idea of the scale of our growth.

  • The community has added 3,751 new, unique conda packages this year, along with a corresponding number of new feedstocks.
  • For the majority of 2020, the conda-forge channel on exceeded 100 million downloads per month.
  • In July of 2020, the conda-forge channel passed 2 billion total, all-time downloads.
  • We've grown our core developer community, adding seven new members to the conda-forge Core team and at least two members to the staged-recipes team.
  • We now have over 2,500 recipe maintainers in the conda-forge GitHub organization.

Big New Features

We've also shipped a ton of big updates to our core infrastructure this year. These updates include

  • PyPy support: We added support for PyPy 3.6 and now supply one of the biggest stacks of PyPy-enabled packages in the PyPy ecosystem.
  • automerge: We now support the automatic merging of PRs on feedstocks using the automerge label or through an opt-in setting in the conda-forge.yml.
  • R 4.0 migration: This migration was the first one to use our automerge infrastructure at scale. With it, we completed a complete rebuild/upgrade of the R ecosystem in about a week.
  • Python updates: We deprecated Python 2.7, completed the Python 3.8 migration, and got about 75% of the way through the Python 3.9 migration.
  • compiler upgrades: We upgraded our compiler infrastructure to GCC 9 and clang 11.
  • CentOS 7 and CentOS 6 EOL: We shipped an option to enable our compilers to use the CentOS 7 sysroot in preparation for the CentOS 6 EOL. We hope to complete the move to CentOS 7 early next year.
  • miniforge: We built our own standalone, miniconda-like installers. These support a broad range of platforms, including osx-arm64 and linux-aarch64.
  • standalone Windows stack: We fully decoupled our Windows recipes from the defaults channel by rebuilding the msys2 recipes.
  • Apple silicon support: We added support for Apple silicon with our osx-arm64 platform. This platform is our first one to use a fully cross-compiled infrastructure.
  • CUDA support: We added support for building CUDA packages on windows and added CUDA 11.0 support.

We know that this year has been extremely difficult for so many of our community members and that the fantastic success of conda-forge would not have been possible without the active participation and support of our community. Thank you everyone so much for the work you put into conda-forge this year, making it the wonderful, community-led resource that it is.

We wish everyone a happy, healthy, and peaceful new year!

· 2 min read

Various members of the community have raised questions publicly and privately about the implications of Anaconda's new Terms of Service (TOS) on First of all, we understand your concerns. We would like to explain a bit how conda-forge works, how the TOS change affects us and conda-forge users, and what our plans as a community are for the future.

· 8 min read
Isuru Fernando

A new platform osx-arm64 has been added to the build matrix of conda-forge. osx-arm64 packages are built to run on upcoming macOS arm64 processors marketed as Apple Silicon. An installer for this platform can be found here.

· 7 min read
Christopher J. 'CJ' Wright

tl;dr Depending on specific version numbers of underlying libraries may be too inaccurate and cause headaches as upstream libraries evolve and change. A more detailed approach is needed. In this post I outline current and potential work on a path towards a more complete inspection of requirements based on APIs and dynamic pinning of libraries.

· 5 min read
Christopher J. 'CJ' Wright

Recently I've been thinking about operational risk (op. risk). Operational risks arise from failures of processes, for instance a missing email, or an automated software system not running properly. Many commercial institutions are interested in minimizing op. risk, since it is risk that produces no value, as opposed to risks associated with investing. This is also something I think about in my job at Lab49, where I'm a software engineering consultant focusing on financial institutions. I think there is also a good analogy for Conda-Forge, even though we are not a commercial outfit. In this case the risk we incur isn't the potential for lost earnings but frustration for our users and maintainers in the form of bugs and lackluster user experience. In this post I explore three main sources of operational risk for Conda-Forge: Automation, Top-Down Control, and Self-Service Structure.